Council of Islamic Ideology backs legislation on triple talaq as punishable offence

Dr Qibla Ayaz, the chairperson of the Council of Islamic Ideology (CII), on Wednesday announced the council's decision to support the declaration of 'triple talaq' as a punishable offence, and that the council would undergo consultations with various scholars soon to decide the appropriate punishment in such cases.
Addressing a press conference soon after a detailed meeting held by the council the same day, the chairperson revealed that a conference will be held soon in which scholars will provide their input on the matter.
The council also decided that to remedy the prevalent divorce rate and other such issues, a consolidated form for divorce will be prepared which will include punitive measures for cases in which divorce is declared three times in one sitting.
A draft for the consolidated form will be submitted for the federal government's review, the CII chairperson informed mediapersons, adding that work had already begun on the form and that it will be ready soon.
Dr Ayaz said that 'on-the-spot' divorce had become a widespread social issue, incidences of which are reported on a daily basis to various mosques, after which the matter is taken to court.
Members of the council during the meeting observed that in such situations, women and children are adversely affected, especially with regard to their emotional health and future education.
It was decided that a nationwide effort will be launched by the council to consult with scholars and impress upon them the urgency of highlighting and promoting family values in Friday sermons.
Another important issue raised and discussed in great detail during the council meeting was that of under-age marriages. Dr Ayaz said that the council considers children below the age of 16 as under-aged.
He said that after consultation with religious scholars and experts on social issues, the matter will be discussed further in the council's next meeting.
The council has urged the government to start an awareness drive with the assistance of religious scholars to discourage people from supporting underage marriages. It was also recommended that educational institutes carry out similar drives to raise awareness regarding the matter.

In the debate on the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Bill, 2017, one aspect of cardinal importance has been overlooked. It is the deliberate refusal to abide by the Rules of Procedure of the Lok Sabha and, indeed, the settled norms of parliamentary practice. The bill was passed by the Lok Sabha on Dec 28 but was stalled in the Rajya Sabha where the BJP does not command a majority.
It affects Muslims exclusively. Yet they were deliberately not consulted at all at any stage. This is outrageous. As Eustace Percy said, “No president of the Board of Education would dream of introducing any measure into this House [of Commons] which had not been discussed ad nauseam with the three associations of educational authorities and the National Union of Traders.” In his classic Parliament, Ivor Jennings cites many instances of such consultations prior to the moving of a bill.
There was extensive consultation before the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937, and the Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939, were enacted. Before the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986, was enacted, prime minister Rajiv Gandhi met Muslim leaders, lawyers and public figures repeatedly in December 1985.
    Muslims are being deliberately marginalised.
Rule 74 of the Lok Sabha’s Rules of Procedure mentions motions that may be moved after introduction of a bill. One of them is “that it be circulated for the purpose of eliciting opinion thereon”. The ‘Directions by the Speaker’ provide a precise procedure for seeking opinions. The bill is sent to state governments to seek “the opinions of members of state legislatures and of such public bodies, selected officers and any other persons as the state governments may think fit to consult”. It is also published in the state government’s gazette. The opinions are printed as ‘Papers to the Bill’ and are laid on the table of the house.
Why was this precise, established procedure not followed in this particular case that involves deep feelings? J.N.D. Anderson points out, “It is the family law that has always represented the very heart of the Sharia, for it is regarded by Muslims as entering into the very warp and woof of their religion.” It has been “basic to Islamic society down the centuries”. Law minister G.S. Pathak recognised in the Lok Sabha in 1966 that “personal laws are mixed up with religion”.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi has had another objective — divide the Muslim vote. Muslim women have a justified grievance of abuse of the utterly un-Islamic triple talaq, aptly called talaq-i-biddat. On each of the three, the route of litigation was adopted. Modi has talked about “getting Muslim women their rights”. A scholar records, “A striking aspect of the 2002 violence [in Gujarat] was the high incidence of sexual violence against Muslim women”. Modi did not weep for his “Muslim sisters” then.
On Aug 22, 2017, a five-judge bench of the Supreme Court of India delivered differing opinions. Contrary to the Quran, two held the “any attempt at reconciliation ... cannot ever take place” and the talaq violated the guarantee of equality. Two others held it to be an integral part of religion, noted moves for reform and recommended legislation. The fifth held that it is not for the court but for parliament to decide. The court’s order reads: “In view of the different opinions, recorded by a majority of 3-2, the practice of ‘talaq-e-biddat’ is set aside”. This is factually wrong since the fifth judge explicitly said the issue was not for the courts to decide.
Still, the divi­ded rulings do not support the draconian bill. It criminalises a breach of contract, which marriage is in Sharia. It makes pronouncement of triple talaq a criminal offence; cognisable and non-bailable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years and a fine. Even the offences of bigamy and adultery are non-cognisable and bailable. Only the aggrieved person can complain. Now it will be open to any stranger to rush to the police to allege that he had heard a man orally pronounce triple talaq and he will be arrested forthwith and put in prison — even if his wife did not wish to complain. Who will look after her and the kids if he is imprisoned?
The bill is patently unconstitutional. Article 21 says: “No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law.” It presumes a procedure that is reasonable and a law that is not arbitrary.
Failure to circulate the bill forms part of a pattern. The aim is to appease the Hindutva constituency. Since promises of an economic bonanza are proving false, Modi will bank on his other plank: Hindutva. Legislative assault on Muslims is part of the strategy. They must be marginalised.



Accident Adventure Afghanistan Agriculture AID Airport Animals Army Arson Article automobile Banks belief birds Budget Bureaucracy BUSINESS Calamity celebration charity Child Labour Child trafficking Christian civic Clash Climate collapse Commerce Communication Corruption Court crash Crime crimes culture currency Cyber crime Defence Department Derailment Development Development And Industry Devotees Diplomacy disaster Dispute Drugs Earthquake Economy Education Election Electricity Embassy Employment Energy Entertainment Environment Excavation Execution exhibition Explosion export Facility Family Famine Fashion felciation festival Finance fire flood Food Food/Agriculture food/health Foreigners Forests fraud Freight Fruit Fuel FUNERAL Hajj handicapped HANG Health Hiousing History Hotel Human Rights Hunting India Industry Infotainment int International internationl Investment journalist Judiciary justice Kashmir KIDNAPPING labour Landslide language Lawyers Legislation Leisure Lifestyle lightning literature Loan Local Manifesto Media Medicines Migrants Minorities MIRACLE mis mishap mishaps Money Laundering Moon Murder n NAB Narcotics National Nature obituary Oppotunity Overseas pakistani Paliament Petroleum Pilgrims pipeline Police POLITICS pollution Post poverty power Prison prisoners Probe project Properties Protest Railway Real Estate Religion relion Rescue Reservoir Reunion Revenue Rivalry Science Seafood Security Sentence Services shemales Sikh Community smoking smuggling Social Social Media Social Welfare Space sports strike Students Suicide Suicide Attack Taxation Technology telecom Terrorism Tourism Trade Trade Union Traditions Tragedy Training transgender Transport Travel Tyranny Vacancies vehicle vendetaa Visa water Weapons weather wedding woman Women Working class youth
South Punjab News : Council of Islamic Ideology backs legislation on triple talaq as punishable offence
Council of Islamic Ideology backs legislation on triple talaq as punishable offence
A draft for the consolidated form will be submitted for the federal government's review, the CII chairperson informed mediapersons, adding that work had already begun on the form and that it will be ready soon.
South Punjab News
Not found any posts VIEW ALL Readmore Reply Cancel reply Delete By Home PAGES POSTS View All RECOMMENDED FOR YOU LABEL ARCHIVE SEARCH ALL POSTS Not found any post match with your request Back Home Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat January February March April May June July August September October November December Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec just now 1 minute ago $$1$$ minutes ago 1 hour ago $$1$$ hours ago Yesterday $$1$$ days ago $$1$$ weeks ago more than 5 weeks ago Followers Follow THIS CONTENT IS PREMIUM Please share to unlock Copy All Code Select All Code All codes were copied to your clipboard Can not copy the codes / texts, please press [CTRL]+[C] (or CMD+C with Mac) to copy